LionkingCMSL (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
lionkingcmsl) wrote2014-10-13 09:38 am
lionkingcmsl) wrote2014-10-13 09:38 am
Entry tags:
More on the PA-9
After thinking about the increased HP of a PA-9 it dawned on me that the radiator area on a traditional PA would probably not be enough. There is some over cooling capacity on a PA, but I don't think it would be enough to cool double a PA-4's (re-built D&H PA-1s) 2400 HP.
I re-imagined the PA-9 with a third shutter panel and a second fan. You lose the characteristic rear porthole, but that isn't required as there is no need to have natural lighting in the back, as there is no steam generator.
So here is the new version of a PA-9:
I re-imagined the PA-9 with a third shutter panel and a second fan. You lose the characteristic rear porthole, but that isn't required as there is no need to have natural lighting in the back, as there is no steam generator.
So here is the new version of a PA-9:
no subject