Link is:
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2015/03/04/local-environmental-groups-warn-of-accident-potential-from-marcellus-shale-freight-trains/News story:
LocalLocal Environmental Groups Warn of Accident Potential From Marcellus Shale Freight TrainsMarch 4, 2015 3:37 PM
By Paul KurtzPHILADELPHIA (CBS) — Last month’s oil train derailment and explosion in West Virginia has prompted environmentalists in Pennsylvania to sound the alarm about the potential dangers that residents here face.
As oil shipments from North Dakota’s Baaken shale deposit have boomed in recent years, there has been a corresponding rise in derailments.
A report released this week by the groups
Penn Environment and the
Frac Tracker Alliance shows that nearly four million Pennsylvanians live within the potential evacuation zone of an oil train accident, including 700,000 at risk here in Philadelphia.
Penn Environment’s David Masur says residents are being left in the dark.
“The train companies and oil companies aren’t even required to tell local communities about oil trains travelling through their backyards and how much oil they’re carrying and what their plans are in case of real dire accidents,” he noted.
Masur says the city has flirted with disaster several times in recent years:
“Just four weeks ago we had a train derailment with oil trains in South Philly, right by the stadium. A near miss, luckily no explosions.”
Later this month, a City Council committee safety panel will take a look at the dangers posed by oil trains.
My response:
Don Miller, Jr • 34 minutes ago
As a railroader I might have a slight bias in my feelings. That being noted, how would these people want the oil transshipped? Pipeline? Would take too long and too costly to build; not to mention the NIMBYs not wanting it near by. By truck? You think moving by rail is dangerous, then it would be at least 10X dangerous by truck. And one rail tank car holds the same amount as ~5 tanker trucks. Could you imagine the congestion on the highways? Rail is by far the safest, cheapest way, and most fuel efficient to move oil and other products. Hundreds of millions of gallons of oil and other hazardous materials are moved daily by rail, without incident. They pick on a few high profile cases to do fear mongering. Should the rail industry upgrade their track? Yes, of course. But do not let a few fear mongers dictate policy towards an entire industry.
Interesting quote here:
Penn Environment’s David Masur says residents are being left in the dark.
“The train companies and oil companies aren’t even required to tell local communities about oil trains traveling through their backyards and how much oil they’re carrying and what their plans are in case of real dire accidents,” he noted.
Guess what neither are trucking companies required to report what is in their trailers, where they are traveling or their responses to accidents. It is because railroads are a fixed guide-way system that they are being picked on. As for explosions it takes an awful lot of heat for an oil tanker to "explode". If a tank car derails, as in the lead photo, which I will note is not an oil train, and there is no fire, no explosions. They don't derail and automatically go "BOOM".
------------------------
Thoughts on either the news story or my reply?