lionkingcmsl: (3d)
[personal profile] lionkingcmsl

Comparsion of the two Conversation renders
by *LionkingCMSL on deviantART

On the top we have the Vue 10 version of the scene and the bottom shows the Poser Pro 2012 version.

I personally like the Vue version as the lighting is more true to life.

The reason the scene is cropped in the lower render is to hide the fact there is no driver in the 'Vette. That is the same reason the windows are heavily tinted in the Vue render. :=3

Date: 2011-12-05 05:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] camstone.livejournal.com
Does either of them use the same render engine as Bryce? I always thought that one was superior.

Date: 2011-12-05 09:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lowen-kind.livejournal.com
No, Cam.

Vue is the vastly superior of the three. Vue has been in some "minor" motion pictures like; 2012, Avatar, Kung Fu Panda, Indiana Jones: The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, ect. Also a little known production house, ILM, uses it. I can't think of a single place Bryce has been used in a motion picture.

Here is e-on Software's show reel for Vue, note these used earlier versions of Vue: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49Z9zRTxkJk&feature=player_embedded

The one thing that I like about Vue is that it will import Poser files directly, and will allow you to re-pose things in Vue using Poser itself. Needless to say that means memory requirements are huge.

E-on's page for the version of Vue 10 can be found here: http://www.e-onsoftware.com/products/vue/vue_10_esprit/

Date: 2011-12-05 10:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] avenginglioness.livejournal.com
It's really interesting seeing the different renders side-by-side. :3

Profile

lionkingcmsl: (Default)
LionkingCMSL

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718 192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 21st, 2026 10:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios