lionkingcmsl: (Trained lion)
[personal profile] lionkingcmsl
While I love Vue 11 Complete there are times that using Poser Pro 2012 is faster and, I admit, easier. So in trying to come up with the most realistic renderings I did a test of the their "Indirect Lighting" settings.

Here is a series of three render tests I did to see how the different setting look:
Indirectlightingtest
The setttings are as follows:
All renders:
Irradiance Cache: 100
Light is an "infinite source" on the right and 45 degrees above the horizon.

A:
Indirect Lighting: Off
Indirect Lighting Quality: N/A
Pixel Samples: 3
Min. Shading Rate: .5

B:
IL: On
ILQ: 7
PS: 3
MSR: .5

C:
IL: On
ILQ: 100
PS: 36
MSR:20

Personally I feel "B" is better. "C" is not quite as "sharp" or "in focus", but that may have to do with the "Pixel Samples" setting.

So, what do you think? Which is better?

[Poll #1905522]
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

lionkingcmsl: (Default)
LionkingCMSL

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718 192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 22nd, 2026 05:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios