AC and DC: Electrically speaking
Jul. 15th, 2013 09:01 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Some idle musing on the train ride in this morning led me to the conclusion that the terms AC and DC are misnomers.
We are taught they they stand for Alternating Current and Direct Current, but when they show graphical representations of said currents they show the voltage waveforms. AC normally shows a nice sine wave, while DC's voltage is at a constant level.
Being you can't have negative current; though it may change direction, the terms should be AV: Alternating Voltage and CV: Constant Voltage. I feel that this more accurately describes what is happening. So that U.S. standard home power would be 120AV and a power supply to a IC board would be labeled as +5CV
I know that I won't change 150+ years of electrical teaching and dogma, but this is what I think of these terms.
Thoughts?
We are taught they they stand for Alternating Current and Direct Current, but when they show graphical representations of said currents they show the voltage waveforms. AC normally shows a nice sine wave, while DC's voltage is at a constant level.
Being you can't have negative current; though it may change direction, the terms should be AV: Alternating Voltage and CV: Constant Voltage. I feel that this more accurately describes what is happening. So that U.S. standard home power would be 120AV and a power supply to a IC board would be labeled as +5CV
I know that I won't change 150+ years of electrical teaching and dogma, but this is what I think of these terms.
Thoughts?
no subject
Date: 2013-07-15 06:09 pm (UTC)I understand what you're trying to say about not being able to have negative current. Amps are amps after all. But like voltage there is an argument to be made that negative amps do exist, and merely represent the amplitude at which current is flowing from positive to negative as opposed to flowing from negative to positive.
no subject
Date: 2013-07-16 11:38 am (UTC)I used to be interested in the nature of electricity when I was younger. I've lost much of the fascination, but can still recall bits of terminology.
IIRC correctly, when current passes through a transformer the wattage remains constant but the ratio of voltage and amperage is adjusted. Something about higher voltages being easier to transmit across a long distance (am I correct so far). If so, when you adjust the power setting on an appliance, for example the control unit on a model train set, are you adjusting the voltage, amperage or both being the wattage? If it's the voltage being adjusted, then would this affect your definitions?
I started typing a question about static electricity, but the electrons in my brain are too worn out this evening.
no subject
Date: 2013-07-16 12:25 pm (UTC)As for the throttle on a model railroad you are adjusting the voltage; the amperage doesn't change. In fact some of the better packs, until the advent of transistorized power packs, and most of the tinplate packs (Lionel, Marx, American Flyer) actually use variable transformers for voltage regulation.
no subject
Date: 2013-07-16 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-07-16 10:38 pm (UTC)So a power supply may supply +12CV and a voltage regulator might change that to +5CV.